Skip to main content

A tale of two economic futures

Germany's fiscal pivot versus US deficit spiral

Germany’s new government, a reluctant coalition between the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU)/Christian Social Union in Bavaria (CSU) and the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), represents the fourth time they have teamed up in coalition since the 1990s.

12 June 2025

This time, the threats they face are existential, with the Alternative for Germany (AfD) and far left parties taking ever more share of the vote. Alongside the inauguration of the new government, a wordy 146-page agreement was published. For the economy, the message was simple. The coalition needs to get Germany’s economy back on track, and quickly. This time they have Germany’s new unleashed fiscal headroom on their side. If they can deliver, this could mark a significant turning point for European equities more broadly, powered by a rebirth in domestically generated European GDP growth.

Germany has significant fiscal headroom to reverse economic stagnation and underinvestment

Long constrained by the constitutional "debt brake" (Schuldenbremse), which caps structural deficits at 0.35% of GDP, the country is now embracing a more pragmatic approach to public investment. With a debt-to-GDP ratio below 65% – far more conservative than many peers – Germany has significant fiscal headroom. For the first time in decades, it appears ready to use it.

Germany has significantly more fiscal headroom than many of its peers. With debt at just 63% of GDP and a modest 2.1% fiscal deficit, it stands well below the US, Japan and most major European economies. Illustratively, Germany could borrow over USD 1.7 trillion before hitting 100% debt-to-GDP and still spend an additional USD 130 billion annually while staying within a 5% deficit threshold. While constitutional fiscal rules remain in place, recent exemptions show their growing scope for flexibility when needed.

Chart 1: Comparative fiscal health: Germany vs major economies

Government debt (% of GDP, 2024)

Fiscal Deficit (% of GDP, 2024)

 
 

Gap to 100% debt/GDP ($bn)

Gap to 5% fiscal deficit ($bn)

 
 
Source: World Bank, GAM Investments, as at 31 December 2024.

Germany’s shift is driven by necessity as much as vision. After years of underinvestment, the cracks in Germany’s infrastructure have become impossible to ignore. The long-term incumbent parties and new CDU/CSU and SDP coalition have only won a narrow mandate to govern, due to a surge in support for the AfD. Infrastructure investment averaged just 2.3% of GDP since the early 2000s – well below the euro area average of 3.3% and France’s 4.3%1. The result has been a growing backlog of neglected assets: over 4,000 bridges in disrepair, declining rail performance with Deutsche Bahn posting a EUR 1.77 billion loss in 2024, and a long-delayed energy grid modernisation that has stymied the country’s clean energy transition. Social infrastructure has fared no better. Schools and hospitals suffer from outdated facilities and limited capacity, while Germany’s once-proud digital infrastructure now trails its European neighbours.

Chart 2: Gross public investment as % of GDP (2018-2022)

 
Source: OECD National Accounts, as at 31 December 2022.

A EUR 500 billion infrastructure fund and a proactive approach to competitiveness

Recognising these weaknesses, Berlin has approved a EUR 500 billion infrastructure fund to be deployed over the next 12 years. This package – averaging roughly 1% of GDP per year – will target transport, energy, digital networks, defence and education. It is a decisive break from the post-2008 austerity model and a strategic bet on long-term productivity and resilience. This, we think, could create a halo effect for European growth.

The 2025 coalition agreement also introduces a broad range of economic reforms aimed at enhancing industrial competitiveness and accelerating the energy transition. Key measures include targeted energy subsidies, such as reducing electricity taxes and capping grid fees, and potentially introducing a heavily discounted power price for energy-intensive industries. Strategic sectors will benefit from expanded gas-fired power capacity and legal frameworks for carbon capture and storage. Tax reforms feature phased corporate tax cuts of five annual 1% cuts starting in 2028, accelerated depreciation for equipment investment, and incentives for workforce participation, including tax-free overtime and income exemptions for working pensioners.

On Wednesday 4 June, German Finance minister Lars Klingbeil confirmed plans for a EUR 46 billion corporate tax break which would enable companies to deduct 30% of the cost of new machinery and other equipment from their tax bill annually between 2025 and 2027. From 2028, the federal corporate tax rate of 15% would then decrease by a point every year to 10%. With the changes, the overall rate would fall to 24%, bringing Germany in line with the OECD average.

Germany is now leading the initiative on European rearmament

Defence has been another area of chronic underinvestment. For decades, Germany's military spending lagged NATO benchmarks, averaging around 1.5% of GDP. This underfunding left the Bundeswehr with outdated equipment and limited operational readiness. In response to growing security challenges, including Russia's aggression in Ukraine, Germany has initiated a significant shift in defence policy. In 2022, a EUR 100 billion special fund was established to modernise the armed forces.

Further reforms came in 2025, when German lawmakers amended the constitution to exempt defence and security spending beyond 1% of GDP from the debt brake. This change enables additional investments in defence infrastructure and capabilities. Chancellor Friedrich Merz has pledged to build Europe's most formidable conventional army, with plans to allocate 3.5% of GDP to military procurement and an additional 1.5% to dual-use infrastructure projects, such as roads and bridges that serve both civilian and military purposes.

Chart 3: Defence expenditure as % of GDP (2024 estimates)

 
Source: GAM Investments, NATO defence spending data, as at 17 June 2024. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_226465.htm

These developments come ahead of the NATO summit scheduled for 24-26 June, 2025, in The Hague. At the summit, NATO members are expected to discuss a proposed increase in defence spending targets to 5% of GDP, with 3.5% dedicated to core military capabilities and 1.5% to broader security-related investments. Germany's proactive steps in defence spending position it as a leader in meeting these ambitious goals. Although it seems unlikely all European NATO members will get there, given the differing fiscal deficits, the direction of travel is clear.

Assuming Europe’s NATO members got to 5% of GDP spend on defence by 2030, it could unlock more than USD 500 billion of incremental spending versus 2023.

By contrast, the US fiscal path is increasingly uncertain

Germany should be able to achieve these significant changes without adding significantly to its national debt. This in stark contrast to the fiscal trajectory of the US. With its debt-to-GDP ratio exceeding 120% and annual deficits expected to remain above USD 1.5 trillion for the foreseeable future, the US is navigating uncharted territory. These levels of borrowing are historically exceptional outside wartime and are becoming increasingly unsustainable in a high-interest-rate environment. Debt servicing costs are now one of the largest components of federal expenditure, threatening to crowd out discretionary spending and limit economic manoeuvrability.

The Republican Party, once known for fiscal conservatism, has increasingly supported large, unfunded expenditures. Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ and proposals for sweeping infrastructure packages and tax cuts, with little regard for budgetary offsets, highlight the growing bipartisan disinterest in fiscal discipline. Markets are beginning to price in the risk of further debt expansion, which could stoke inflationary pressures or even spark a bond market correction.

Germany’s fiscal pivot could signal a generational opportunity for Europe

We believe Germany's fiscal pivot can change the investment landscape for Europe. This shift, combined with a more assertive and growth minded EU could signal a significant change to Europe’s investment proposition. Within Europe, we see particularly attractive exposure associated with Germany's renaissance, including sectors tied to electrification, banks, industrials, and construction – areas poised to benefit most directly from the country's structural investment wave.


Tom O’Hara, Jamie Ross and David Barker manage European Equities strategies at GAM Investments. You can find out more information on the team and the strategies they are responsible for here.

1Source: Financial Times, as at 20 August 2024. https://www.ft.com/content/9361356c-5c53-4268-ac2c-3e16d7c6d818
Important disclosures and information
The information contained herein is given for information purposes only and does not qualify as investment advice. Opinions and assessments contained herein may change and reflect the point of view of GAM in the current economic environment. No liability shall be accepted for the accuracy and completeness of the information contained herein. Past performance is no indicator of current or future trends. The mentioned financial instruments are provided for illustrative purposes only and shall not be considered as a direct offering, investment recommendation or investment advice or an invitation to invest in any GAM product or strategy. Reference to a security is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. The securities listed were selected from the universe of securities covered by the portfolio managers to assist the reader in better understanding the themes presented. The securities included are not necessarily held by any portfolio or represent any recommendations by the portfolio managers. Specific investments described herein do not represent all investment decisions made by the manager. The reader should not assume that investment decisions identified and discussed were or will be profitable. Specific investment advice references provided herein are for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily representative of investments that will be made in the future. No guarantee or representation is made that investment objectives will be achieved. The value of investments may go down as well as up. Investors could lose some or all of their investments.

References to indexes and benchmarks are hypothetical illustrations of aggregate returns and do not reflect the performance of any actual investment. Investors cannot invest in indices which do not reflect the deduction of the investment manager’s fees or other trading expenses. Such indices are provided for illustrative purposes only. Indices are unmanaged and do not incur management fees, transaction costs or other expenses associated with an investment strategy. Therefore, comparisons to indices have limitations. There can be no assurance that a portfolio will match or outperform any particular index or benchmark.

This article contains forward-looking statements relating to the objectives, opportunities, and the future performance of the equity markets generally. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as; “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to financial condition, results of operations, and success or lack of success of any particular investment strategy. All are subject to various factors, including, but not limited to general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting a portfolio’s operations that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Such statements are forward-looking in nature and involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or examples. None of GAM or any of its affiliates or principals nor any other individual or entity assumes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, subsequent events or any other circumstances. All statements made herein speak only as of the date that they were made.

This disclosure shall in no way constitute a waiver or limitation of any rights a person may have under such laws and/or regulations.

In the United Kingdom, this material has been issued and approved by GAM London Ltd, 8 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7GB, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Tom O'Hara

Investment Director
My Insights

Jamie Ross

Investment Manager
My Insights

David Barker

Investment Manager
My Insights

Contact us - we'd love to hear your feedback

Related Articles

The great rotation in luxury markets

Flavio Cereda

Gain the AT1 Edge - Why it makes sense to access AT1s via a fund

Romain Miginiac

The sustainability imperative in emerging markets

Meera Patel

Investment Opinions

Contacts

Please visit our Contacts and Locations page.